 |
|
|
Arkansas
Lemon Law Statutes
Arkansas
Title 4, Chapter 90, Sections 401-417
4-90-401. Title.
This subchapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Arkansas
New Motor Vehicle Quality Assurance Act".
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, § 1; 1993, No. 297, § 1.
4-90-402. Legislative determinations and intent.
The
Arkansas General Assembly recognizes that a motor vehicle
is a major consumer
acquisition and that a defective motor vehicle undoubtedly
creates a hardship for the
consumer. The Arkansas General Assembly further recognizes
that a duly franchised motor
vehicle dealer is an authorized service agent of the manufacturer.
It is the intent of the
Arkansas General Assembly that a good faith motor vehicle warranty
complaint by a consumer
be resolved by the manufacturer within a specified period of
time. It is further the intent of the
Arkansas General Assembly to provide the statutory procedures
whereby a consumer may
receive a replacement motor vehicle, or a full refund, for
a motor vehicle which cannot be
brought into conformity with the warranty provided for in this
subchapter. However, nothing
in this subchapter shall in any way limit the rights or remedies
which are otherwise available to
a consumer under any other law.
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, § 2; 1993, No. 297, § 2.
4-90-403. Definitions.
As
used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
- "Calendar day" means any day of the week other
than a legal holiday;
- "Collateral
charges" means those additional charges to a consumer
wholly incurred
as a result of the acquisition of the motor vehicle. For the
purposes of this subchapter,
collateral charges include, but are not limited to, manufacturer-installed
or agent-installed
items, earned finance charges, sales taxes, title charges,
and charges for extended
warranties provided by the manufacturer, its subsidiary, or
agent;
- "Condition" means
a general problem that may be attributable to a defect in
more
than one (1) part;
- "Consumer" means
the purchaser or lessee, other than for the purposes of lease
or
resale, of a new or previously untitled motor vehicle, or any
other person entitled by
the terms of the warranty to enforce the obligations of the
warranty during the duration
of the motor vehicle quality assurance period, provided the
purchaser has titled and
registered the motor vehicle as prescribed by law;
- "Incidental
charges" means those reasonable costs incurred by the
consumer,
including, but not limited to, towing charges and the costs
of obtaining alternative
transportation which are directly caused by the nonconformity
or nonconformities
which are the subject of the claim, but shall not include loss
of use, loss of income, or
personal injury claims;
- "Lease
price" means the aggregate of:
- The lessor's actual purchase costs;
- Collateral charges, if applicable;
- Any fee paid to another person to obtain the lease;
- Any insurance or other costs expended by the lessor for
the benefit of the lease;
- An amount equal to state and local sales taxes, not otherwise
included as collateral charges, paid by the lessor when the
vehicle was initially purchased; and
- An amount equal to five percent (5%) of the lessor's actual
purchase price;
- "Lessee" means
any consumer who leases a motor vehicle for one (1) year
or more
pursuant to a written lease agreement which provides that the
lessee is responsible for
repairs to such motor vehicle;
- "Lessee
cost" means the aggregate deposit and rental payments
previously paid to
the lessor for the leased vehicle;
- "Lessor" means
a person who holds title to a motor vehicle leased to a lessee
under
the written lease agreement or who holds the lessor's rights
under such agreement;
- "Manufacturer" means:
-
Any person who is engaged in the business of constructing
or assembling new
motor vehicles or installing, on previously assembled vehicle
chassis, special bodies
or equipment which, when installed, form an integral part of
the new motor vehicle;
or
-
In the case of motor vehicles not manufactured in the United
States, any person
who is engaged in the business of importing new motor vehicles
into the United
States for the purpose of selling or distributing new motor
vehicles to new motor
vehicle dealers;
- "Motor
vehicle" or "vehicle" means any self-propelled
vehicle licensed,
purchased, or leased in this state and primarily designed for
the transportation of
persons or property over the public streets and highways, but
does not include
mopeds, motorcycles, the living facilities of a motor home,
or vehicles over ten
thousand pounds (10,000 lbs.) gross vehicle weight rating.
For purposes of this
definition, the limit of ten thousand pounds (10,000 lbs.)
gross vehicle weight rating
does not apply to motor homes;
- "Motor
vehicle quality assurance period" means a period of
time that:
- Begins:
- On the date of original delivery of a motor vehicle; or
-
In the case of a replacement vehicle provided by a manufacturer
to a
consumer under this subchapter, on the date of delivery of
the replacement
vehicle to the consumer; and
-
Ends twenty-four (24) months after the date of the original
delivery of the
motor vehicle to a consumer, or the first twenty-four thousand
(24,000) miles of
operation attributable to the consumer, whichever is later;
- "Nonconformity" means
any specific or generic defect or condition or any
concurrent combination of defects or conditions that:
-
Substantially impairs the use, market value, or safety of
a motor vehicle; or
-
Renders the motor vehicle nonconforming to the terms of an
applicable
manufacturer's express warranty or implied warranty of merchantability;
- "Person" means
any natural person, partnership, firm, corporation, association,
joint venture, trust, or other legal entity;
- "Purchase
price" means the cash price paid for the motor vehicle
appearing in the
sales agreement or contract, including any net allowance for
a trade-in vehicle;
- "Replacement
motor vehicle" means a motor vehicle which is identical
or
reasonably equivalent to the motor vehicle to be replaced,
as the motor vehicle replaced
existed at the time of the original acquisition; and
- "Warranty" means
any written warranty issued by the manufacturer, or any
affirmation of fact or promise made by the manufacturer, excluding
statements made by
the dealer, in connection with the sale or lease of a motor
vehicle to a consumer which
relates to the nature of the material or workmanship and affirms
or promises that such
material or workmanship is free of defects or will meet a specified
level of performance.
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, § 3; 1993, No. 297, § 3; 1995,
No. 302, § 1.
4-90-404.
Notice by consumer - Disclosure by manufacturer, agent, or
dealer.
-
A consumer must notify the manufacturer of a claim under
this subchapter if the
manufacturer has made the disclosure required by subsection
(b) of this section.
-
However, if the manufacturer has not made the required disclosure,
the consumer
is not required to notify the manufacturer of a claim under
this subchapter.
-
At the time of the consumer's purchase or lease of the vehicle,
the manufacturer, its
agent, or an authorized dealer shall provide to the consumer
a written statement that
explains the consumer's rights and obligations under this subchapter.
-
The written statement shall be prepared by the Consumer Protection
Division of
the Office of the Attorney General and shall include the telephone
number of the
Consumer Protection Division that the consumer can contact
to obtain information
regarding his or her rights and obligations under this subchapter.
-
For each failure of the manufacturer, its agent, or an authorized
dealer to provide to
a consumer the written statement required under this section,
the manufacturer shall be
liable to the State of Arkansas for a civil penalty of not
less than twenty-five dollars
($25.00) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
-
The manufacturer shall clearly and conspicuously disclose
to the consumer, in the
warranty or owner's manual, that written notice of the nonconformity
is required before
the buyer may be eligible for a refund or replacement of the
vehicle.
-
The manufacturer shall provide the consumer with conspicuous
notice of the
address and phone number for its zone, district, or regional
office for this state at the
time of vehicle acquisition, to which the buyer must send notification.
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, § 5; 1993, No. 297, § 5; 1995,
No. 302, § 2.
4-90-405. Required warranty repairs.
If
a motor vehicle does not conform to the warranty and the
consumer reports the
nonconformity to the manufacturer, its agent, or authorized
dealer during the motor vehicle
quality assurance period, the manufacturer, its agent, or authorized
dealer shall make such
repairs as are necessary to correct the nonconformity, even
if the repairs are made after the
expiration of the term of protection.
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, § 4; 1993, No. 297, § 4.
4-90-406. Failure to make required repairs.
-
After three (3) attempts have been made to repair the same
nonconformity that
substantially impairs the motor vehicle, or after one (1) attempt
to repair a nonconformity
that is likely to cause death or serious bodily injury, the
consumer shall give written
notification, by certified or registered mail, to the manufacturer
of the need to repair the
nonconformity in order to allow the manufacturer a final attempt
to cure the
nonconformity.
-
The manufacturer shall, within ten (10) days after receipt
of the notification, notify
and provide the consumer with the opportunity to have the vehicle
repaired at a
reasonably accessible repair facility, and, after delivery
of the vehicle to the designated
repair facility by the consumer, the manufacturer shall, within
ten (10) days, conform
the motor vehicle to the warranty.
-
If the manufacturer fails to notify and provide the consumer
with the opportunity
to have the vehicle repaired at a reasonably accessible repair
facility or fails to perform
the repairs within the time periods prescribed in this subsection,
the requirement that
the manufacturer be given a final attempt to cure the nonconformity
does not apply
and a nonrebuttable presumption of a reasonable number of attempts
to repair arises.
-
If the manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer has
not conformed the motor
vehicle to the warranty by repairing or correcting one (1)
or more nonconformities that
substantially impair the motor vehicle after a reasonable number
of attempts, the
manufacturer, within forty (40) days, shall:
-
At the time of its receipt of payment of a reasonable offset
for use by the
consumer, replace the motor vehicle with a replacement motor
vehicle acceptable
to the consumer; or
-
Repurchase the motor vehicle from the consumer or lessor
and refund to the
consumer or lessor the full purchase price or lease price,
less a reasonable offset
for use and less a reasonable offset for physical damage sustained
to the vehicle
while under the ownership of the consumer.
-
The replacement or refund shall include payment of all collateral
and
reasonably incurred incidental charges.
- (A)
The consumer shall have an unconditional right to choose
a refund rather than a
replacement.
(B) At the time of such refund or replacement, the consumer,
lienholder, or lessor
shall furnish to the manufacturer clear title to and possession
of the motor vehicle.
-
The amount of reasonable offset for use by the consumer shall
be determined by
multiplying the actual price of the new motor vehicle paid
or payable by the consumer,
including any charges for transportation and manufacturer-installed
or agent-installed
options, by a fraction having as its denominator one hundred
twenty thousand
(120,000) and having as its numerator the number of miles traveled
by the new motor
vehicle prior to the time the buyer first delivered the vehicle
to the manufacturer, its
agent, or authorized dealer for correction of the problem that
gave rise to the
nonconformity.
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, § 6; 1993, No. 297, § 6; 1995,
No. 302, § 3.
§ 4-90-407. Refunds.
-
Refunds shall be made to the consumer and lienholder of record,
if any, as their
interests may appear.
-
If applicable, refunds shall be made to the lessor and lessee
as follows:
-
The lessee shall receive the lessee cost less a reasonable
offset for use; and
-
The lessor shall receive the lease price less the aggregate
deposit and rental
payments previously paid to the lessor for the leased vehicle.
-
If the manufacturer makes a refund to the lessor or lessee
pursuant to this subchapter,
the consumer's lease agreement with the lessor shall be terminated
upon payment of the
refund and no penalty for early termination shall be assessed.
-
If a replaced vehicle was financed by the manufacturer, its
subsidiary, or agent, the
manufacturer, subsidiary, or agent may not require the buyer
to enter into any refinancing
agreement concerning a replacement vehicle that would create
any financial obligations
upon the buyer beyond those of the original financing agreement.
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, § 7; 1993, No. 297, § 7.
§ 4-90-408. Reimbursement of towing and rental costs.
Whenever
a vehicle is replaced or refunded under this subchapter,
the manufacturer shall
reimburse the consumer for necessary towing and rental costs
actually incurred as a direct
result of the nonconformity.
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, § 10; 1993, No. 297, § 10.
§ 4-90-409. Option to retain use of vehicle. A
consumer has the option of retaining the use of any vehicle
returned under this subchapter
until the time that the consumer has been tendered a full refund
or a replacement vehicle of
comparable value.
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, § 11; 1993, No. 297, § 11.
§ 4-90-410. Presumption of reasonable attempts to repair
- Extension of time to repair
in case of war, invasion, strike, fire, flood, or natural disaster.
-
A rebuttable presumption of a reasonable number of attempts
to repair is considered
to have been undertaken to correct a nonconformity if:
-
The nonconformity has been subject to repair as provided
in § 4-90-406(a), but
the nonconformity continues to exist;
-
The vehicle is out of service by reason of repair, or attempt
to repair, any
nonconformity for a cumulative total of thirty (30) calendar
days; or
-
There have been five (5) or more attempts, on separate occasions,
to repair any
nonconformities that together substantially impair the use
and value of the motor
vehicle to the consumer.
-
-
The thirty (30) calendar days in subdivision (a)(2) of this
section shall be extended
by any period of time during which repair services are not
available as a direct result of
war, invasion, strike, fire, flood, or natural disaster.
-
The manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer shall provide
or make provisions
for the free use of a vehicle to any consumer whose vehicle
is out of service beyond
thirty (30) days by reason of delayed repair as a direct result
of war, invasion, strike,
fire, flood, or natural disaster.
-
The burden is on the manufacturer to show that the reason
for an extension under
subsection (b) of this section was the direct cause for the
failure of the manufacturer, its
agent, or authorized dealer to cure any nonconformity during
the time of the event.
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, § 12; 1993, No. 297, § 12.
§ 4-90-411. Diagnosis or repair - Documentation.
-
A manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer may not refuse
to diagnose or repair
any vehicle for the purpose of avoiding liability under this
subchapter.
-
A manufacturer, its agent, or authorized dealer shall provide
a consumer with a
written repair order each time the consumer's vehicle is brought
in for examination or
repair.
-
The repair order must indicate all work performed on the
vehicle, including
examination of the vehicle, parts, and labor.
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, § 13; 1993, No. 297, § 13.
§ 4-90-412. Resale of returned nonconforming vehicle. If
a motor vehicle has been replaced or repurchased by a manufacturer
as the result of a court
judgment, an arbitration award, or any voluntary agreement
entered into between a
manufacturer and a consumer that occurs after a consumer complaint
has been investigated and
evaluated pursuant to this subchapter or a similar law of another
state, the motor vehicle may
not be resold in Arkansas unless:
-
The manufacturer provides the same express warranty the manufacturer
provided
to the original purchaser, except that the term of the warranty
need only last for twelve thousand (12,000) miles or twelve
(12) months after the date of resale, whichever occurs first;
and
-
The manufacturer provides a written disclosure, signed by
the consumer, indicating
that the vehicle was returned to the manufacturer because of
a nonconformity not cured within a reasonable time as provided
by Arkansas law.
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, § 14; 1993, No. 297, § 14.
§ 4-90-413. Affirmative defenses.
It
is an affirmative defense to any claim under this subchapter
that:
-
The nonconformity, defect, or condition does not substantially
impair the use,
value, or safety of the motor vehicle;
-
The nonconformity, defect, or condition is the result of
an accident, abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modification
or alteration of the motor vehicle by persons other than the
manufacturer,
its agent, or authorized dealer;
-
The claim by the consumer was not filed in good faith; or
-
Any other defense allowed by law that may be raised against
the claim.
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, § 15; 1993, No. 297, § 15.
§ 4-90-414. Informal proceeding as precedent.
-
Any manufacturer doing business in this state, entering into
franchise agreements
for the sale of its motor vehicles in this state, or offering
express warranties on its motor vehicles sold or distributed
for sale in this state, shall operate, or participate in, an
informal dispute settlement proceeding located in the State
of Arkansas which complies with the requirements of this section.
-
The provisions of § 4-90-406(b)(1) and (2) concerning
refunds or replacement do
not apply to a consumer who has not first used this informal
proceeding before
commencing a civil action, unless the manufacturer allows a
consumer to commence an
action without first using this informal procedure.
-
The consumer shall receive adequate written notice from the
manufacturer of
the existence of the procedure.
-
Adequate written notice may include the incorporation of
the informal dispute
settlement procedure into the terms of the written warranty
to which the motor vehicle does not conform.
-
The informal dispute procedure must be certified by the Consumer
Protection
Division of the Office of the Attorney General as meeting the
following criteria:
-
The informal dispute procedure must comply with the minimum
requirements of
the Federal Trade Commission for informal dispute settlement
procedures as set forth
in 16 C.F.R. § 703.1 et seq., as in effect on the date
of adoption of this subchapter,
unless any provision of 16 C.F.R. § 703.1 et seq. is in
conflict with this subchapter, in
which case the provisions of this subchapter shall govern;
-
The informal dispute procedure must prescribe a reasonable
time, not to exceed
thirty (30) days after the decision is accepted by the buyer,
within which the
manufacturer or its agent must fulfill the terms of its decisions;
-
No documents shall be received by any informal dispute procedure
unless
those documents have been provided to each of the parties in
the dispute at or prior to
the proceeding, with an opportunity for the parties to comment
on the documents
either in writing or orally.
-
If a consumer is present during the informal dispute proceeding,
the consumer
may request postponement of the proceeding meeting to allow
sufficient time to
review any documents presented at the time of the meeting which
had not been
presented to the consumer prior to the time of the meeting;
-
The informal dispute procedure shall allow each party to
appear and make an
oral presentation within the State of Arkansas unless the consumer
agrees to submit the dispute for decision on the basis of documents
alone or by telephone, or unless the party fails to appear
for an oral presentation after reasonable prior written notice.
-
If the consumer agrees to submit the dispute for decision
on the basis of
documents alone, then the manufacturer or dealer representatives
may not
participate in the discussion or decision of the dispute;
-
Consumers shall be given an adequate opportunity to contest
a manufacturer's
assertion that a nonconformity falls within intended specifications
for the vehicle by
having the basis of the manufacturer's claim appraised by a
technical expert selected
and paid for by the consumer prior to the informal dispute
settlement hearing;
-
A consumer may not be charged with a fee to participate in
an informal dispute
procedure; and
-
Any party to the dispute has the right to be represented
by an attorney in an
informal dispute proceeding.
-
The informal dispute procedure shall annually submit a pool
of not less than six
(6) members who are appointed with the advice and consent of
the Consumer ProtectionDivision of the Office of the Attorney
General.
-
Selected strictly by rotation, one (1) member shall hear
disputes scheduled for a
particular session unless the consumer requests a panel of
three (3) members, in
which case three (3) members shall hear disputes scheduled
for a particular
three-member session.
- If the informal dispute procedure deems it appropriate
to require the services
of an independent investigator, such investigator shall be
selected from a pool of not
less than four (4) members who are appointed annually with
the advice and consent
of the Consumer Protection Division of the Office of the Attorney
General and
from which the particular investigator shall be selected strictly
by rotation.
-
Upon notification to the administrator of any informal dispute
procedure that a
determination has been made by the Consumer Protection Division
of the Office of the
Attorney General that a member of any pool is not conforming
to standards of fairness
and impartiality, that member shall be immediately removed
from the pool.
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, § 16; 1993, No. 297, § 16.
§ 4-90-415. Enforcement - Exclusivity - Costs and expenses.
-
A consumer may bring a civil action to enforce this subchapter
in a court of competent
jurisdiction.
-
This subchapter does not limit the rights and remedies that
are otherwise available to a
consumer under any applicable provisions of law.
-
A consumer who prevails in any legal proceeding under this
subchapter is entitled to
recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the aggregate
amount of costs and expenses, including attorney's fees based
upon actual time expended by the attorney, determined by the
court to have been reasonably incurred by the consumer for
or in connection with the commencement and prosecution of the
action.
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, §§ 17-19; 1993, No. 297, §§ 17-19.
§ 4-90-416. Time limitation for commencement of action.
- An action brought under this subchapter must be commenced
within two (2) years
following the date the buyer first reports the nonconformity
to the manufacturer, its agent,
or authorized dealer.
-
When the buyer has commenced an informal dispute settlement
procedure described in
§ 4-90-414, the two-year period specified in subsection
(a) of this section begins to run at
the time the informal dispute settlement procedure is being
commenced.
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, § 20; 1993, No. 297, § 20.
§ 4-90-417. Deceptive trade practices. A
violation of any of the provisions of this subchapter shall
be deemed a deceptive trade
practice under § 4-88-101 et seq.
History.
Acts 1993, No. 285, § 21; 1993, No. 297, § 21.
|
|
The
Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is a Federal Law that protects the buyer of any product which costs more than $25 and comes with an express written warranty.
This law applies to any product that you buy that does not perform as it should.
Your car is a major investment, rationalized by the peace of mind that flows from its expected dependability and safety. Accordingly, you are entitled
to expect an automobile properly constructed and regulated to provide reasonably safe, trouble-free, and dependable transportation – regardless
of the exact make and model you bought. Unfortunately, sometimes these principles do not hold true and defects arise in automobiles. Although one defect
is not actionable, repeated defects are as there exists a generally accepted rule that unsuccessful repair efforts render the warrantor liable. Simply
put, there comes a time when “enough is enough” – when after having to take your car into the shop for repairs an inordinate number
of times and experiencing all of the attendant inconvenience, you are entitled to say, ‘That’s all,’ and revoke, notwithstanding the
seller’s repeated good faith efforts to fix the car. The rationale behind these basic principles is clear: once your faith in the vehicle is shaken,
the vehicle loses its real value to you and becomes an instrument whose integrity is impaired and whose operation is fraught with apprehension. The question
thus becomes when is “enough”?
As you know, enough is never enough from your warrantor’s point of view and you should simply continue to have your defective vehicle repaired – time
and time again. However, you are not required to allow a warrantor to tinker with your vehicle indefinitely in the hope that it may eventually be fixed.
Rather, you are entitled to expect your vehicle to be repaired within a reasonable opportunity. To this end, both the federal Moss Warranty Act, and
the various state “lemon laws,” require repairs to your vehicle be performed within a reasonable opportunity.
Under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty
Act, a warrantor should perform adequate repairs in at least two, and possibly three, attempts to correct a particular defect. Further, the Magnuson-Moss
Warranty Act’s reasonableness requirement applies to your vehicle as a whole rather than to each individual defect
that arises. Although most of the Lemon Laws vary from state to state, each individual law usually require a warrantor to cure a specific defect within
four to five attempts or the automobile as a whole within thirty days. If the warrantor fails to meet this obligation, most of the lemon laws provide
for a full refund or new replacement vehicle. Further, this reasonable number of attempts/reasonable opportunity standard, whether it be that of the
Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act or that of the Lemon Laws, is akin to strict liability – once this threshold has been met, the continued existence of
a defect is irrelevant and you are still entitled to relief.
One of the most important parts of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is its fee shifting
provision. This provision provides that you may recover the attorney fees incurred in the prosecution of your case if you are successful – independent
of how much you actually win. That rational behind this fee shifting provision is to twofold: (1) to ensure you will be able to vindicate your rights
without having to expend large sums on attorney's fees and (2) because automobile manufacturers are able to write off all expenses of defense as a
legitimate business expense, whereas you, the average consumer, obviously does not have that kind of economic staying power. Most of the Lemon Laws contain
similar fee shifting provisions.
You may also derive additional warranty rights from the Uniform Commercial Code; however, the Code does not allow you
in most states to recover your attorney fees and is also not as consumer friendly as the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act or the various state lemon laws.
The narrative information on Magnuson-Moss, UCC and lemon laws on these pages is provided by Marshall Meyers, attorney.
|
|
Uniform
Commercial Code Summary
The Uniform Commercial Code or UCC has been enacted in all 50 states and some of the territories of the United States. It is the primary source of law
in all contracts dealing with the sale of products. The TARR refers to Tender, Acceptance, Rejection, Revocation and applies to different aspects of
the consumer's "relationship" with the purchased goods.
TENDER -
The tender provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code contained in Section2-601 provide that the buyer is entitled to reject any goods that fail in
any respect to conform to the contract. Unfortunately, new cars are often technically complex and their innermost workings are beyond the understanding
of the average new car buyer. The buyer, therefore, does not know whether the goods are then conforming.
ACCEPTANCE -
The new car buyer accepts the goods believing and expecting that the manufacturer will repair any problem he has with the goods under the warranty.
REJECTION
-
The new car buyer may discover a problem with the vehicle within the first few miles of his purchase. This would allow the new car buyer to reject
the goods. If the new car buyer discovers a defect in the car within a reasonable time to inspect the vehicle, he may reject the vehicle. This period
is not defined. On the one hand, the buyer must be given a reasonable time to inspect and that reasonable time to inspect will be held as an acceptance
of the vehicle. The Courts will decide this reasonable time to inspect based on the knowledge and experience of the buyer, the difficulty in discovering
the defect, and the opportunity to discover the defect.
The following is an example of a case of rejection: Mr. Zabriskie purchase a new 1966 Chevrolet Biscayne. After picking up the car on Friday evening,
while en route to his home 2.5 miles away, and within 7/10ths of a mile from the dealership, the car stalled and stalled again within 15 feet. Thereafter,
the car would only drive in low gear. The buyer rejected the vehicle and stopped payment on his check. The dealer contended that the buyer could not
reject the car because he had driven it around the block and that was his reasonable opportunity to inspect. The New Jersey Court said;
To the layman,
the complicated mechanisms of today's automobile are a complete mystery. To have the automobile inspected by someone with sufficient expertise to disassemble
the vehicle in order the discover latent defects before the contract is signed, is assuredly impossible and highly impractical. Consequently, the first
few miles of driving become even more significant to the excited new car buyer. This is the buyer's first reasonable opportunity to enjoy his new vehicle
to see if it conforms to what it was represented to be and whether he is getting what he bargained for. How long the buyer may drive the new car under
the guise of inspection of new goods is not an issue in the present case because 7/10th of a mile is clearly within the ambit of a reasonable opportunity
to inspect. Zabriskie Chevrolet, Inc. v. Smith, 240 A. 2d 195(1968)
It is suggested that Courts will tend to excuse use by consumers if possible.
REVOCATION -
What happens when the consumer has used the new car for a lengthy period of time? This is the typical lemon car case. The UCC provides that a buyer
may revoke his acceptance of goods whose non-conformity substantially impairs the value of the goods to him when he has accepted the goods without
discovery of a non-conformity because it was difficult to discover or if he was assured that non-conformities would be repaired. Of course, the average
new car buyer does not learn of the nonconformity until hundreds of thousands of miles later. And because quality is job one, and manufacturers are
competing on the basis of their warranties, the consumer always is assured that any noncomformities he does discover will be remedied.
What is a noncomformity substantially impairing the value of the vehicle?
- A noncomformity may include a number of relatively minor defects whose cumulative total adds up to a substantial impairment. This is the "Shake
Faith" Doctrine first stated in the Zabrisikie case. "For a majority of people the purchase of a new car is a major investment, rationalized
by the peace of mind that flows from its dependability and safety. Once their faith is shaken, the vehicle loses not only its real value in their eyes,
but becomes an instrument whose integrity is substantially impaired and whose operation is fraught with apprehension".
- A substantial noncomformity may include a failure or refusal to repair the goods under the warranty. In Durfee V. Rod Baxter Imports, the Minnesota
Court held that the Saab owner that was plagued by a series of of annoying minor defects and stalling, which were never repaired after a number of attempts,
could revoke, "if repairs are not successfully undertaken within a reasonable time", the consumer may elect to revoke.
- Substantial Non Conformity and Lemon Laws often define what may be considered a substantial impairment. These definitions have been successfully used
to flesh out the substantial impairment in the UCC.
Additional narrative information on Magnusson-Moss, UCC and lemon laws on these pages is provided by T. Michael Flinn, attorney.
|
|
|
|
 |