 |
|
|
Vermont
Lemon Law Statutes
Chapter 115, Sections 4170 - 4181
§ 4170. LEGISLATIVE INTENT
The legislature finds and declares that manufacturers, distributors
and importers of new motor vehicles should be obligated to provide
speedy and less costly resolution of automobile warranty problems.
Manufacturers should be required to provide in as expeditious
a manner as possible a refund of the consumer's purchase price
or payments to a lessor and lessee or a replacement vehicle that
is acceptable to the consumer whenever the manufacturer is unable
to make the vehicle conform with its applicable warranty. New
motor vehicle dealers and used motor vehicle dealers cannot be
sued under this chapter.
§ 4171. DEFINITIONS
As used in this chapter:
- "Board" means, unless otherwise indicated, the
Vermont motor vehicle arbitration board.
- "Consumer" means the purchaser, other than for
purposes of resale of a new motor vehicle or lessee of a new
motor vehicle, other than for the purposes of sub-lease, which
has not been previously leased by another person, any person
to whom such motor vehicle is transferred during the duration
of an express warranty applicable to the motor vehicle, and any
other person entitled by the terms of the warranty to enforce
the obligations of the warranty, but "consumer" shall
not include any governmental entity or any business or commercial
enterprise which registers or leases three or more motor vehicles.
- "Early termination costs" mean expenses and obligations
incurred by a motor vehicle lessee as a result of an early termination
of a written lease agreement and surrender of a motor vehicle
to a manufacturer under the provisions of 9 V.S.A. § 4172(e),
including penalties for prepayment of finance arrangements.
- "Lease or leased" means a written agreement with
a lessee as defined in subdivision (5) of this section, which
shall be for the use of a motor vehicle for consideration for
a term of two or more years.
- "Lessee" means any consumer who leases a motor
vehicle pursuant to a written lease agreement for a term of two
or more years.
- "Motor vehicle" means a motor vehicle which is
purchased or leased, or registered in the state of Vermont and
is registered in Vermont within 15 days of the date of purchase
or lease and shall not include tractors, motorized highway building
equipment, road-making appliances, snowmobiles, motorcycles,
mopeds, or the living portion of recreation vehicles, or trucks
with a gross vehicle weight over 10,000 pounds.
- "Manufacturer" means any person, resident or nonresident,
who manufactures or assembles new motor vehicles or imports for
distribution through distributors of motor vehicles or any partnership,
firm, association, joint venture, corporation or trust, resident
or nonresident, which is controlled by a manufacturer. Additionally,
the term "manufacturer" shall include:
- "Distributor," meaning any person, resident or
nonresident, who in whole or in part offers for sale , sells,
or distributes any new motor vehicle to new motor vehicle dealers
or new motor vehicle lessors or maintains factory representatives
or who controls any person, firm, association, corporation, or
trust, resident or nonresident, who in whole or in part offers
for sale, sells or distributes any new motor vehicle to new motor
vehicle dealers or new motor vehicle lessors; and
- "Factory branch" meaning any branch office
maintained by a manufacturer for the purpose of selling, leasing,
offering
for sale or lease, vehicles to a distributor or new motor vehicle
dealer or for directing or supervising, in whole or in part,
factory distributor representatives.
- "Motor vehicle lessor" means a person who holds
title to a motor vehicle leased to a lessee under a written lease
agreement for a term of two or more years, or who holds the lessor's
rights under such an agreement.
- A "New motor vehicle" means a passenger
motor vehicle which has been sold to a new motor vehicle dealer
or motor vehicle
lessor by a manufacturer and which has not been used for other
than demonstration purposes and on which the original title has
not been issued from the new motor vehicle dealer other than
to a motor vehicle lessor.
- Warranty shall be defined as including the following:
" Express warranty" means express warranties as defined
in the Uniform Commercial Code§ 2-313, plus any written warranty
of the manufacturer.
§ 4172. ENFORCEMENT OF WARRANTIES
- Every new motor vehicle as defined in section 4171 of this
title sold in this state must conform to all applicable warranties.
- It shall be the manufacturer's obligation under this chapter
to insure that all new motor vehicles sold or leased in this
state conform with manufacturer's express warranties. The manufacturer
may delegate responsibility to its agents or authorized dealers
provided, however, in the event the manufacturer delegates its
responsibility under this chapter to its agents or authorized
dealers, it shall compensate the dealer for all work performed
by the dealer in satisfaction of the manufacturer's responsibility
under this chapter in the manner set forth in chapter 108 of
this title known as the "Motor Vehicle Manufacturers, Distributors
and Dealers' Franchising Practices Act" as that act may
be from time to time amended.
- If a new motor vehicle does not conform to all applicable
express warranties and the consumer reports the nonconformity
to the manufacturer, its agent or authorized dealer during the
term of the warranty, the manufacturer shall cause whatever repairs
are necessary to conform the vehicle to the warranties, notwithstanding
the fact that the repairs are made after the expiration of a
warranty term.
- A manufacturer, its agent or authorized dealer shall not
refuse to provide a consumer with a written repair order and
shall provide to the consumer each time the consumer's vehicle
is brought in for examination or repair of a defect, a written
summary of the complaint and a fully itemized statement indicating
all work performed on the vehicle including, but not limited
to, examination of the vehicle, parts and labor.
- If, after a reasonable number of attempts, the manufacturer,
its agent or authorized dealer or its delegate is unable to conform
the motor vehicle to any express warranty by repairing or correcting
any defect or condition covered by the warranty which substantially
impairs the use, market value, or safety of the motor vehicle
to the consumer, the manufacturer shall, at the option of the
consumer within 30 days of the effective date of the board's
order, replace the motor vehicle with a new motor vehicle from
the same manufacturer, if available, of comparable worth to the
same make and model with all options and accessories with appropriate
adjustments being allowed for any model year differences or shall
accept return of the vehicle from the consumer and refund to
the consumer the full purchase price or to the lessee in the
case of leased vehicles, as provided in subsection (i) of this
section. In those instances in which a refund is tendered, the
manufacturer shall refund to the consumer the full purchase price
as indicated in the purchase contract and all credits and allowances
for any trade-in or downpayment, license fees, finance charges,
credit charges, registration fees and any similar charges and
incidental and consequential damages or in the case of leased
vehicles, as provided in subsection (i) of this section. Refunds
shall be made to the consumer and lienholder, if any, as their
interests may appear or to the motor vehicle lessor and lessee
as provided in subsection (i) of this section. A reasonable allowance
for use shall be that amount directly attributable to use by
the consumer prior to his or her first repair attempt and shall
be calculated by multiplying the full purchase price of the vehicle
by a fraction having as its denominator 100,000 and having as
its numerator the number of miles that the vehicle traveled prior
to the first attempt at repairing the vehicle. If the manufacturer
refunds the purchase price or a portion of the price to the consumer,
the purchase and use tax shall be refunded by the state to the
consumer in the proportionate amount. To receive a refund, the
consumer must file a claim with the commissioner of motor vehicles.
- It shall be an affirmative defense to any claim under this
chapter that an allegednonconformity does not substantially impair
the use, market value or safety or that the noncomformity is
the result of abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modifications or
alterations of a motor vehicle by a consumer.
- It shall be presumed that a reasonable number of attempts
have been undertaken to conform a motor vehicle to the applicable
warranties if:
- the same nonconformity as identified in any written examination
or repair order has been subject to repair at least three times
by the manufacturer, its agent or authorized dealer and at least
the first repair attempt occurs within the express warranty term
and the same nonconformity continues to exist, or
- the vehicle is out of service by reason of repair of one
or more nonconformities, defects or conditions for a cumulative
total of 30 or more calendar days during the term of the express
warranty. The term of any warranty and the 30-day period shall
be extended by any period of time during which repair services
were not available to the consumer because of war, invasion,
strike, fire, flood or other natural disaster. If an extension
of time is necessitated due to these conditions, the manufacturer
shall cause provision for the free use of a vehicle to the consumer
whose vehicle is out of service. A vehicle shall not be deemed
out of service if it is available to the consumer for a major
part of the day.
- In order for an attempt at repair to qualify for the presumptions
of this section, the attempt at repair must be evidenced by a
written examination or repair order issued by the manufacturer,
its agent or its authorized dealer. The presumptions of this
section shall only apply to three attempts at repair evidenced
by written examination or repair orders undertaken by the same
agent or authorized dealer, unless the consumer shows good cause
for taking the vehicle to a different agent or authorized dealer.
- In cases in which a refund is tendered by a manufacturer
for a leased motor vehicle under subsection (e) of this section,
the refund and rights of the motor vehicle lessor, lessee and
manufacturer shall be in accordance with the following:
- The manufacturer shall provide to the lessee, the aggregate
deposit and rental payments previously paid to the motor vehicle
lessor by the lessee, and incidental and consequential damages,
if applicable, minus a reasonable allowance for use and allocated
payments for purchase and use tax. The aggregate deposit shall
include, but not be limited to, all cash payments and trade-in
allowances tendered by the lessee to the motor vehicle lessor
under the lease agreement. The reasonable allowance for use shall
be calculated by multiplying the aggregate deposit and rental
payments made by the lessee on the motor vehicle by a fraction
having as its denominator 100,000 and having as its numerator
the number of miles that the vehicle traveled prior to the first
attempt at repairing the vehicle.
- The manufacturer shall provide to the motor vehicle lessor
the aggregate of the following:
- the lessor's actual purchase cost, less payments made by
the lessee;
- the freight cost, if applicable;
- the cost for dealer or manufacturer-installed accessories,
if applicable;
- any fee paid to another to obtain the lease;
- an amount equal to five percent of the lessor's actual purchase
cost as prescribed in subdivision (2)(A) of this section. The
amount in this subdivision shall be instead of any early termination
costs as defined in § 4171(3) of this chapter or as described
in the lease agreement.
- The purchase and use tax shall be refunded by the state
to whomever paid the tax. The party must file a claim with the
commissioner
of the department of motor vehicles.
- The lessee's lease agreement with the motor vehicle lessor
and all contractual obligations shall be terminated upon a decision
of the board in favor of the lessee. The lessee shall notbe liable
for any further costs or charges to the manufacturer or motor
vehicle lessor under the lease agreement.
- The motor vehicle lessor shall release the motor vehicle
title to the manufacturer upon payment by the manufacturer under
the provisions of this subsection.
- The board shall give notice to the motor vehicle lessor
of the lessee's filing of a request for arbitration under this
chapter
and shall notify the motor vehicle lessor of the date, time and
place scheduled for a hearing before the board. The motor vehicle
lessor shall provide testimony and evidence necessary to the
arbitration proceedings. Any decision of the board shall be binding
upon the motor vehicle lessor.
§ 4173. PROCEDURE TO OBTAIN REFUND OR REPLACEMENT
- After the third attempt at repair or correction of the nonconformity,
defect or condition, or after the vehicle is out of service by
reason of repair of one or more nonconformities, defects or conditions
for a cumulative total of 30 or more calendar days as provided
in this chapter, the consumer shall notify the manufacturer and
lessor in writing, on forms to be provided by the manufacturer
at the time the new motor vehicle is delivered, of the nonconformity,
defect or condition and the consumer's election to proceed under
this chapter. The forms shall be made available by the manufacturer
to the Vermont motor vehicle arbitration board, and any other
public or nonprofit agencies that shall request them. Notice
of consumer rights under this chapter shall be conspicuously
displayed by all authorized dealers and agents of the manufacturer.
The consumer shall in the notice, elect whether to use the dispute
settlement mechanism and/or the arbitration provisions established
by the manufacturer or to proceed under the Vermont motor vehicle
arbitration board as established under this chapter. The consumer's
election of whether to proceed before the board or the manufacturer's
mechanism shall preclude his or her recourse to the method not
selected.
- A consumer cannot pursue a remedy under this chapter if he
or she has discontinued financing or lease payments if the payments
have been discontinued due to the manufacturer's breach of obligation
under this chapter or of a breach of the manufacturer's warranties.
- Arbitration of the consumer's complaint, either through the
manufacturer's dispute settlement mechanism or the board, must
be held within 45 days of receipt by the manufacturer or the
board and the manufacturer of the consumer's notice electing
the remedy of arbitration unless the consumer or the manufacturer
has good cause for an extension of time, not to exceed an additional
30-day period. If the extension of time is requested by the manufacturer,
the manufacturer shall provide free use of a vehicle to the consumer
if the consumer's vehicle is out of service. In the event the
consumer elects to proceed in accordance with the manufacturer's
dispute settlement mechanism and the arbitration of the dispute
is not held within 45 days of the manufacturer's receipt of the
consumer's notice and the manufacturer is not able to establish
good cause for the delay, the consumer shall be entitled to receive
the relief requested under this chapter.
- Within the 45-day period set forth in subsection (c) of this
section, the manufacturer shall have one final opportunity to
correct and repair the defect which the consumer claims entitles
him or her to a refund or replacement vehicle. If the consumer
is satisfied with the corrective work done by the manufacturer
or his delegate, the arbitration proceedings shall be terminated
without prejudice to the consumer's right to request arbitration
be recommenced if the repair proves unsatisfactory for the duration
of the express warranty.
- The manufacturer shall refund the amounts provided for in
section 4172(e) or (i) of this chapter within 30 days of a decision
of the board or within 15 days of final adjudication.
§ 4174. VERMONT MOTOR VEHICLE ARBITRATION BOARD
- There is created a Vermont motor vehicle arbitration board
consisting of five members and two alternate members to be appointed
by the governor for terms of three years. Board members may be
appointed for two additional three-year terms. One member of
the board shall be a new car dealer in Vermont, one member and
one alternate shall be persons knowledgeable in automobile mechanics,
and three members and one alternate shall be persons having no
direct involvement in the design, manufacture, distribution,
sales or service of motor vehicles or their parts. Board members
shall be compensated in accordance with the provisions of 32
V.S.A. § 1010. The board shall be attached to the transportation
board and shall receive administrative services from the transportation
board.
- The board shall promulgate rules under the provisions of
3 V.S.A. chapter 25 to implement the provisions of this chapter.
- The board may issue subpoenas to compel the attendance of
witnesses to testify under oath and to produce documents.
- The board shall render a decision within 30 days of the conclusion
of a hearing and has authority to issue any and all damages as
are provided by this chapter.
§ 4175. FEES AND COSTS
There shall be no filing fee or costs assessed against the consumer
for using the Vermont motor vehicle arbitration board or the
manufacturer's dispute settlement mechanism. In the event an
authorized franchise dealer or any of its employees including
mechanics or service personnel are called upon to testify or
produce documents, repair orders or other materials in any arbitration
held before the Vermont motor vehicle arbitration board or the
manufacturer's dispute settlement mechanism, the person who requests
the participation of the authorized franchise dealer or requests
the production of documents must make arrangements in advance
to reasonably compensate the dealer for the actual expense involved.
Where a conflict arises as to actual expenses, the board shall
make that determination. In the event the consumer prevails,
these costs shall be reimbursed to the consumer by the manufacturer.
§ 4176. APPEAL FROM BOARD
- The decision of the board shall be final and shall not
be modified or vacated unless, on appeal to the superior court
a
party to the arbitration proceeding proves, by clear and convincing
evidence, that:
- the award was procured by corruption, fraud or other undue
means;
- there was evident partiality by the board or corruption or
misconduct prejudicing the rights of any party by the board;
- the board exceeded its powers;
- the board refused to postpone a hearing after being shown
sufficient cause to do so or refused to hear evidence material
to the controversy or otherwise conducted the hearing contrary
to the rules promulgated by the board so as to prejudice substantially
the rights of a party.
An application to vacate or modify an award shall be made within
30 days after delivery of a copy of the award to the applicant
except that if predicated upon corruption, fraud or other undue
means, it may be made within 30 days after such grounds are known
or should have been known. In the event an award is confirmed,
the party who prevails shall be awarded the attorney's fees incurred
in obtaining confirmation of the award together with all costs.
- When a judgment of the superior court affirms an award
of
the board, permission of the presiding judge shall be required
for review. Review may be conditioned upon the appellant paying
appellee's appellate attorney's fees, giving security for costs,
expenses and financial loss resulting from the passage of time
for review.
§ 4177. UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE ACTS AND PRACTICES
Failure of the manufacturer, its agents, authorized dealers,
or motor vehicle lessors to comply with a decision of the board
shall constitute an unfair or deceptive act or practice under
9 V.S.A. chapter 63.
§ 4178. LIMITATIONS
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as imposing any liability
on a manufacturer's authorized dealers or creating a cause of
action by a manufacturer against its authorized agents or dealers.
It shall be a violation of 9 V.S.A. chapter 108 for a manufacturer
to engage in reprisals or threats of reprisals, directly or indirectly,
against any authorized dealer arising out of the dealer's efforts
to repair a motor vehicle under the provisions of this chapter.
§ 4179. EFFECTIVE DATE; LIMITATIONS
- This chapter shall apply to motor vehicles beginning with
the model year following July 1, 1984. Any proceedings initiated
under this chapter shall be commenced within one year following:
- the expiration of the express warranty term; or
- one year following the manufacturer's last attempt at repair
of the nonconformity which gives rise to the consumer's request
that the vehicle be replaced or the money refunded, whichever
comes later.
- Nothing in this chapter shall in any way limit the rights
or remedies which are otherwise available to a consumer under
any other law.
§ 4180. NOTIFICATION TO CONSUMERS
The manufacturer of every motor vehicle sold in this state beginning
with the model year following July 1, 1984 shall provide a clear
and conspicuous written notice of the consumer's rights under
this chapter and at the time of the delivery of every new motor
vehicle in this state beginning with the model year following
July 1, 1984 shall provide the consumer with a stamped self-addressed
notice in a form satisfactory to the Vermont motor vehicle arbitration
board sufficient to notify the manufacturer of the consumer's
election to proceed under this chapter. The manufacturer shall
not delegate this responsibility to its authorized dealers. The
manufacturer of every new motor vehicle sold in this state beginning
with the effective date of this chapter shall also provide a
clear and conspicuous notice that informs consumers of their
rights under this chapter.
§ 4181. SALE OF DEFECTIVE MOTOR VEHICLES
Any manufacturer, its agent or authorized dealer who attempts
to resell a motor vehicle after final determination, adjudication
or settlement, pursuant to the provisions of this chapter or
after final determination, adjudication or settlement under similar
laws of any other state shall apprise prospective buyers in Vermont
by means of a clearly visible window sticker and such manufacturers
are prohibited from reselling in Vermont any vehicle determined
or adjudicated as having a serious safety defect. Notice that
a vehicle has been returned pursuant to such law shall also be
conspicuously printed on the motor vehicle certificate of title.
|
|
The
Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is a Federal Law that protects the buyer of any product which costs more than $25 and comes with an express written warranty.
This law applies to any product that you buy that does not perform as it should.
Your car is a major investment, rationalized by the peace of mind that flows from its expected dependability and safety. Accordingly, you are entitled
to expect an automobile properly constructed and regulated to provide reasonably safe, trouble-free, and dependable transportation – regardless
of the exact make and model you bought. Unfortunately, sometimes these principles do not hold true and defects arise in automobiles. Although one defect
is not actionable, repeated defects are as there exists a generally accepted rule that unsuccessful repair efforts render the warrantor liable. Simply
put, there comes a time when “enough is enough” – when after having to take your car into the shop for repairs an inordinate number
of times and experiencing all of the attendant inconvenience, you are entitled to say, ‘That’s all,’ and revoke, notwithstanding the
seller’s repeated good faith efforts to fix the car. The rationale behind these basic principles is clear: once your faith in the vehicle is shaken,
the vehicle loses its real value to you and becomes an instrument whose integrity is impaired and whose operation is fraught with apprehension. The question
thus becomes when is “enough”?
As you know, enough is never enough from your warrantor’s point of view and you should simply continue to have your defective vehicle repaired – time
and time again. However, you are not required to allow a warrantor to tinker with your vehicle indefinitely in the hope that it may eventually be fixed.
Rather, you are entitled to expect your vehicle to be repaired within a reasonable opportunity. To this end, both the federal Moss Warranty Act, and
the various state “lemon laws,” require repairs to your vehicle be performed within a reasonable opportunity.
Under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty
Act, a warrantor should perform adequate repairs in at least two, and possibly three, attempts to correct a particular defect. Further, the Magnuson-Moss
Warranty Act’s reasonableness requirement applies to your vehicle as a whole rather than to each individual defect
that arises. Although most of the Lemon Laws vary from state to state, each individual law usually require a warrantor to cure a specific defect within
four to five attempts or the automobile as a whole within thirty days. If the warrantor fails to meet this obligation, most of the lemon laws provide
for a full refund or new replacement vehicle. Further, this reasonable number of attempts/reasonable opportunity standard, whether it be that of the
Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act or that of the Lemon Laws, is akin to strict liability – once this threshold has been met, the continued existence of
a defect is irrelevant and you are still entitled to relief.
One of the most important parts of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is its fee shifting
provision. This provision provides that you may recover the attorney fees incurred in the prosecution of your case if you are successful – independent
of how much you actually win. That rational behind this fee shifting provision is to twofold: (1) to ensure you will be able to vindicate your rights
without having to expend large sums on attorney's fees and (2) because automobile manufacturers are able to write off all expenses of defense as a
legitimate business expense, whereas you, the average consumer, obviously does not have that kind of economic staying power. Most of the Lemon Laws contain
similar fee shifting provisions.
You may also derive additional warranty rights from the Uniform Commercial Code; however, the Code does not allow you
in most states to recover your attorney fees and is also not as consumer friendly as the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act or the various state lemon laws.
The narrative information on Magnuson-Moss, UCC and lemon laws on these pages is provided by Marshall Meyers, attorney.
|
|
Uniform
Commercial Code Summary
The Uniform Commercial Code or UCC has been enacted in all 50 states and some of the territories of the United States. It is the primary source of law
in all contracts dealing with the sale of products. The TARR refers to Tender, Acceptance, Rejection, Revocation and applies to different aspects of
the consumer's "relationship" with the purchased goods.
TENDER -
The tender provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code contained in Section2-601 provide that the buyer is entitled to reject any goods that fail in
any respect to conform to the contract. Unfortunately, new cars are often technically complex and their innermost workings are beyond the understanding
of the average new car buyer. The buyer, therefore, does not know whether the goods are then conforming.
ACCEPTANCE -
The new car buyer accepts the goods believing and expecting that the manufacturer will repair any problem he has with the goods under the warranty.
REJECTION
-
The new car buyer may discover a problem with the vehicle within the first few miles of his purchase. This would allow the new car buyer to reject
the goods. If the new car buyer discovers a defect in the car within a reasonable time to inspect the vehicle, he may reject the vehicle. This period
is not defined. On the one hand, the buyer must be given a reasonable time to inspect and that reasonable time to inspect will be held as an acceptance
of the vehicle. The Courts will decide this reasonable time to inspect based on the knowledge and experience of the buyer, the difficulty in discovering
the defect, and the opportunity to discover the defect.
The following is an example of a case of rejection: Mr. Zabriskie purchase a new 1966 Chevrolet Biscayne. After picking up the car on Friday evening,
while en route to his home 2.5 miles away, and within 7/10ths of a mile from the dealership, the car stalled and stalled again within 15 feet. Thereafter,
the car would only drive in low gear. The buyer rejected the vehicle and stopped payment on his check. The dealer contended that the buyer could not
reject the car because he had driven it around the block and that was his reasonable opportunity to inspect. The New Jersey Court said;
To the layman,
the complicated mechanisms of today's automobile are a complete mystery. To have the automobile inspected by someone with sufficient expertise to disassemble
the vehicle in order the discover latent defects before the contract is signed, is assuredly impossible and highly impractical. Consequently, the first
few miles of driving become even more significant to the excited new car buyer. This is the buyer's first reasonable opportunity to enjoy his new vehicle
to see if it conforms to what it was represented to be and whether he is getting what he bargained for. How long the buyer may drive the new car under
the guise of inspection of new goods is not an issue in the present case because 7/10th of a mile is clearly within the ambit of a reasonable opportunity
to inspect. Zabriskie Chevrolet, Inc. v. Smith, 240 A. 2d 195(1968)
It is suggested that Courts will tend to excuse use by consumers if possible.
REVOCATION -
What happens when the consumer has used the new car for a lengthy period of time? This is the typical lemon car case. The UCC provides that a buyer
may revoke his acceptance of goods whose non-conformity substantially impairs the value of the goods to him when he has accepted the goods without
discovery of a non-conformity because it was difficult to discover or if he was assured that non-conformities would be repaired. Of course, the average
new car buyer does not learn of the nonconformity until hundreds of thousands of miles later. And because quality is job one, and manufacturers are
competing on the basis of their warranties, the consumer always is assured that any noncomformities he does discover will be remedied.
What is a noncomformity substantially impairing the value of the vehicle?
- A noncomformity may include a number of relatively minor defects whose cumulative total adds up to a substantial impairment. This is the "Shake
Faith" Doctrine first stated in the Zabrisikie case. "For a majority of people the purchase of a new car is a major investment, rationalized
by the peace of mind that flows from its dependability and safety. Once their faith is shaken, the vehicle loses not only its real value in their eyes,
but becomes an instrument whose integrity is substantially impaired and whose operation is fraught with apprehension".
- A substantial noncomformity may include a failure or refusal to repair the goods under the warranty. In Durfee V. Rod Baxter Imports, the Minnesota
Court held that the Saab owner that was plagued by a series of of annoying minor defects and stalling, which were never repaired after a number of attempts,
could revoke, "if repairs are not successfully undertaken within a reasonable time", the consumer may elect to revoke.
- Substantial Non Conformity and Lemon Laws often define what may be considered a substantial impairment. These definitions have been successfully used
to flesh out the substantial impairment in the UCC.
Additional narrative information on Magnusson-Moss, UCC and lemon laws on these pages is provided by T. Michael Flinn, attorney.
|
|
|
|
 |